Budget Advisory Committee

2006 - 2007 California Healthy Kids Survey

2006-07 Annual Report for Oroville Union High-(61515)

What funding did your LEA receive in 2006-07?
Yes	No	Funding Sources
√		A. SDFSCA Title IV Entitlement
	√	B. 4-8 TUPE Entitlement
	√	C. 6-8 TUPE Competitive Funds
√		D. 9-12 TUPE Competitive Funds
√		E. AB 1113 Safe Schools & Violence Prevention Act
	√	F. Rural Educational Achievement Program (REAP) (Transfered 100% of your SDFSCA Title IV funding to other programs).

Principle of Effectiveness: Conducting Needs Assessments

Programs shall be based on a thorough assessment of objective data about drugs and violence, assets, and protective factors in schools and communities served.

Question 1	Yes	No
Based on analysis of California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) and/or other locally available data, has your program identified the most pressing alcohol, tobacco, other drug and violence-related issues among your students?	√

Question 2	Yes	No
Based on analysis of CHKS resiliency and/or locally available data, has your program identified program needs to improve youth development assets?	√

size=2 width="100%" align=center>

Principle of Effectiveness: Performance Measures

The LEA shall establish performance measures and biennial (every two years) goals aimed at ensuring safe, orderly and drug-free learning environments.

Question 3 This question relates to your current performance indicators. Your LEA defined these in your most recently approved Local Education Agency Plan (LEAP). INDICATORS A-L MUST BE ADDRESSED. With the exception of the Truancy Rate indicator, data to report on your indicators is available from your California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS).
	Alcohol, Tobacco, Other Drug, Violence Prevention and Protective Factors Performance Measures --INDICATORS--	California Healthy Kids Indicator Data							Baseline Year (LEAP)	Biennial Goal (LEAP) %
		Consent Grade	active 01-02	active 02-03	active 03-04	04-05	05-06	06-07	Baseline Year (LEAP)	Biennial Goal (LEAP) %
A.	The percentage of students that have ever used cigarettes will decrease biennially by:	5th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
A.		7th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
B.	The percentage of students that have used cigarettes within the past 30 days will decrease biennially by:	7th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		9th	18%	NA	12%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	-4%
		11th	21%	NA	12%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	-4%
		NT	56%	NA	29%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	-4%
C.	The percentage of students that have ever used marijuana will decrease biennially by:	5th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
C.		7th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
D.	The percentage of students that have used alcohol within the past 30 days will decrease biennially by:	7th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		9th	34%	NA	25%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	-5%
		11th	40%	NA	33%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	-5%
		NT	64%	NA	39%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	-5%
E.	The percentage of students that have used marijuana within the past 30 days will decrease biennially by:	7th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		9th	21%	NA	11%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	-4%
		11th	19%	NA	16%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	-4%
		NT	65%	NA	26%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	-4%
F.	The percentage of students that feel very safe at school will increase biennially by: Note: The response items for this indicator were revised in 2003/04. If the baseline year for this indicator was prior to 2003/04, the comparison from Baseline to Most Recent is invalid.	5th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		7th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		9th			9%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+4%
		11th			10%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+4%
		NT			31%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+4%

Question 3--Continued This question relates to your current performance indicators. Your LEA defined these in your most recently approved Local Education Agency Plan (LEAP). INDICATORS A-L MUST BE ADDRESSED. With the exception of the Truancy Rate indicator, data to report on your indicators is available from your California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS).
	Alcohol, Tobacco, Other Drug, Violence Prevention and Protective Factors Performance Measures --INDICATORS--	California Healthy Kids Indicator Data							Baseline Year (LEAP)	Biennial Goal (LEAP) %
		Grade Consent	01-02 active	02-03 active	03-04 active	04-05	05-06	06-07	Baseline Year (LEAP)	Biennial Goal (LEAP) %
G.	The percentage of students that have been afraid of being beaten up during the past 12 months will decrease biennially by:	7th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		9th	32%	NA	26%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	-4%
		11th	16%	NA	21%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	-4%
		NT	28%	NA	15%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	-4%
H.	The percentage of students that report high levels of caring relationships with a teacher or other adult at their school will increase biennially by:	5th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		7th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		9th	NA	NA	27%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+5%
		11th	NA	NA	42%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+5%
		NT	NA	NA	38%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+5%
I.	The percentage of students that report high levels of high expectations from a teacher or other adult at their school will increase biennially by:	5th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		7th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		9th	NA	NA	40%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+5%
		11th	NA	NA	52%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+5%
		NT	NA	NA	42%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+5%
J.	The percentage of students that report high levels of opportunities for meaningful participation at their school will increase biennially by:	5th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		7th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		9th	NA	NA	16%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+5%
		11th	NA	NA	18%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+5%
		NT	NA	NA	15%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+5%

Question 3--Continued This question relates to your current performance indicators. Your LEA defined these in your most recently approved Local Education Agency Plan (LEAP). INDICATORS A-L MUST BE ADDRESSED. With the exception of the Truancy Rate indicator, data to report on your indicators is available from your California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS).
	Alcohol, Tobacco, Other Drug, Violence Prevention and Protective Factors Performance Measures --INDICATORS--	California Healthy Kids Indicator Data							Baseline Year (LEAP)	Biennial Goal (LEAP) %
		Grade Consent	01-02 active	02-03 active	03-04 active	04-05	05-06	06-07	Baseline Year (LEAP)	Biennial Goal (LEAP) %
K.	The percentage of students that report high levels of school connectedness at their school will increase biennially by:	5th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		7th	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
		9th	NA	NA	28%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+5%
		11th	NA	NA	41%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+5%
		NT	NA	NA	28%	NA	NA	NA	01/02	+5%

Truancy Performance Indicator This is an *ANNUAL* indicator.		Truancy Rates
		2003/04 Rate	2004/05 Rate*	2005/06 Rate*	2006/07 Current Year Rate*	Annual Goal
L.	The percentage of students who have been truant will decrease annually by:	13	1	3	5	-3%
* Calculate the percentage rates in the LEA by tallying the number of students who have been classified as truant during the school year per Education Code Section 48260.5, and dividing the total by the CBEDS enrollment for the same school year.

This section is for recording any performance indicators that were included in your LEA Plan. You may leave this section blank if you do not have any additional indicators or want to drop an indicator, or you may add new indicators here if you wish. If you have an optional indicator, please input it in the space provided using the pattern [indicator] will [increase or decrease] [over what period: annually, biennially, etc.] by some number or percentage. For example, "The expulsion rate will decrease annually by" 2%. Also indicate the grade(s) or grade span for the indicator (e.g. 5 or K-6 or 5,7,9,11), the goal, and the Baseline and Most Recent year data.
Additional (Optional) Performance Measures from LEA Plan List Indicators below		Grade(s) or Span	Baseline Data		Goal	Most Recent Data
		Grade(s) or Span	Year	#/%	#/%	Year	#/%
1.	Percentage of students reporting drinking 5 drinks within 2 hours in the last 30 days will decrease by 5%	9-12	00/01	9th 22% 11th 30%	5%	04/05	9th 19% 11th 27%
2.	The percentage of students reporting ever driving drunk or riding in a car with someone who's been drinking will decrease by 10%	9-12	00/01	9th 30% 11th 37%	10%	04/05	9th 25% 11th 35%
3.	The percentage of students reporting having been harrassed will decrease by 5%	9-12	00/01	9th 44% 11th 40%	5%	04/05	9th 21% 11th 20%
4.			-			-


Question 4		Yes	No
Were the biennial goals (listed in Question 3) established with input from appropriate school, community, and parent representatives and did these representatives also review whether these goals were achieved?		√
Question 5
What steps were taken to review research or local evaluation data which influenced the selection of prevention activities for 2006-2007? (Check all that apply)		Yes	No
A.	Attended workshops and conferences addressing research-validated strategies	√
B.	Discussed options with a county office of education TUPE/SDFSCA coordinator	√
C.	Discussed options with County Health Agencies	√
D.	Examined evaluation data for our programs for evidence of effectiveness	√
E.	Talked with staff from other LEAs who have conducted the activities being considered	√
F.	Utilized Getting Results: Developing Safe and Healthy Kids	√
G.	Utilized the California Healthy Kids Resource Center web site	√
H.	Other (describe) National list servs OSDFS and SAMHSA	√


Question 6
What technical assistance is still needed to better implement effective, science-based alcohol, tobacco, other drug, violence prevention, and youth development programs? (Check all that apply)		Yes	No
A.	Better networking with other districts		√
B.	Better networking with our county office of education		√
C.	More support for prevention from district staff, parents, community, etc.	√
D.	More access to research and evaluation on prevention strategies		√
E.	Other (describe) How to sustain programs with decreasing state and federal funding	√
F.	Other (describe) How to sustain programs in light of academic success standards focus	√

size=2 width="100%" align=center>

Principle of Effectiveness: Selecting Effective Research-validated Programs

Agencies shall design and implement activities based on research or evaluation that provides evidence that the strategies used prevent or reduce drug use, violence, or disruptive behavior.

Question 7

Use this section to identify the predominant science-based prevention programs used by your LEA.

∙ Identify only predominant programs, defined as being used with at least 50 percent of the students at targeted grade level(s).
∙ Check the grade levels in which at least 50 percent of the students received the program.
∙ Indicate the total number students (across all grade levels indicated) that received the program.
∙ Check the funding source(s) for each program.

Project SUCCESS-ATD Focus
Target Grade(s) grades at which 50% of students received	Targeted Population total number of students received	Funding check all that apply	Fidelity check all that apply
9	400	SDFSC TUPE 9+ Other	Training Documentation Checklists

Question 8	Yes	No
Do you plan any changes in science-based programs, or grade level implementation for 2007-08?		√


Question 9. Promising Program waiver granted by State Board of Education Our records indicate that your LEA has not been granted any waiver to fund Promising Programs using SDFCA funds. If you have any questions about the waiver process or identification numbers, please contact the Safe and Healthy Kids Program Office at the California Department of Education at (916) 319-0920.

Question 10. Support Strategies and Activities
Use this section to identify any TUPE Innovative Prevention Programs. Although these programs are on the Promising Programs list, they may be supported with TUPE funds without seeking a waiver.
∙ Identify only predominant programs, as defined as being used with at least 50 percent of the students at the targeted grade level(s). For example, if program xyz is provided to over 50 percent of your students in grades 5 and 6, check 5 and 6 and list the number of students served. If the program is not provided to at least 50 percent of the students in any grade, do not list it.
∙ Check the grade levels in which at least 50 percent of the students received the program.
∙ Indicate the total number students (across all grade levels indicated) that received the program.
∙ Check the funding source(s) for each program.

Innovative Programs/Focus	2006/07 Information				2007/08 Information
Innovative Programs/Focus	Used During 06/07?	Targeted Grade(s) grades at which 50% of students received*	Targeted Population total number of students received	Funding check all that apply	To Be Used During 07/08?	Planned Implement- ation Date date it will be provided to students
A. Basement Bums, Focus: T	No				No	NA
B. Personal/Social Skills Lessons, Focus: T	No				No	NA
C. Project Alive, Focus: T	No				No	NA
D. Project Life, Focus: T	No				No	NA
E. Project SCAT, Focus: T	No				No	NA
F. Smokeless School Days, Focus: T	No				No	NA
G. Teens Tackle Tobacco (TTT), Focus: T	No				No	NA
H. Tobacco Free Generations, Focus: T	No				No	NA

Question 11. Research based Activities and Strategies
Identify the additional strategies and activities used to support your primary prevention and intervention programs. These include any changes utilized primarily outside the classroom setting, although small components could be classroom-based. These activities and strategies are the categories in Appendix D of the LEAP.
∙ Identify only predominant programs, as defined as at least 50 percent of the students at certain grade level(s) having access. For example, if program xyz is accessible to over 50 percent of your students in grades 5 and 6, check 5 and 6. If the program is not accessible than 50 percent of the students in any grade, do not list it.
∙ Check the grade levels in which at least 50 percent of the students had access the program.
∙ Check the funding source(s) for each program.

Research Based Activities Listed in Appendix D of the LEAP and in Getting Results-available at: www.gettingresults.com	2006/07 Information				2007/08
	Used During 06/07?	Targeted Grade(s) grades at which 50% of students had access	ATODVYD Focus	Funding check all that apply	To Be Used During 06/07?
A. After School Program Getting Results Part I pp 77-78.	No				No
B. Conflict Mediation/Resolution Getting Results Part I pp. 63-65 and 127-129.	Yes	9 10 11	Violence Youth D.	SDFSC Other	Yes
C. Early Intervention & Counseling Getting Results Part I pp. 72, 100-101, 106-107.	Yes	9 10 11 12	Alcohol Tobacco O Drug Violence Youth D.	SDFSC TUPE 9+ Other	Yes
D. Environmental Strategies Getting Part I pp. 73-74, Part II pp. 47-48, 76-79, 89-94.	No				No
E. Family and Community Collaboration Getting Results Part I pp. 104-105, Part II pp. 26-28, 33.	Yes	9 10 11 12	Alcohol Tobacco O Drug Violence Youth D.	SDFSC TUPE 9+ Other	Yes
F. Media Literacy and Advocacy Getting Results Part II p. 45, Update 3 pp 22-24.	Yes	9 10 11 12	Tobacco	SDFSC TUPE 9+ Other	Yes
G. Mentoring Getting Results Part I p. 49.	No				No
H. Peer-Helping and Peer Leaders Getting Results Part I pp. 104-107, Update 3 pp. 43-45.	Yes	9 10 11 12	Violence Youth D.	Other	Yes
I. Positive Alternatives Getting Results Part I pp. 79-81, 104-106, 108-109.	Yes	9 10 11 12	Alcohol Tobacco O Drug Violence Youth D.	SDFSC TUPE 9+ Other	Yes
J. School Policies Getting Results Part I pp. 66-72, Part II pp. 22-23.	Yes	9 10 11 12	Alcohol Tobacco O Drug Violence Youth D.	SDFSC TUPE 9+ AB 1113 Other	Yes
K. Service Learning/Community Service Getting Results Part I pp. 81-82, Part II pp. 46-47.	No				No
L. Student Assistance Programs Getting Results pp. 72, 89-90.	Yes	9 10 11 12	Alcohol Tobacco O Drug Violence Youth D.	SDFSC TUPE 9+ Other	Yes
M. Tobacco-Use Cessation Getting Results Part II pp. 28, 42-43, 72-74.	Yes	9 10 12	Tobacco	TUPE 9+	Yes
N. Youth Development/Caring Schools/Caring Classroom Getting Results Part I pp. 121-123, 136-137, Part II p. 28, and Update I.	Yes	9 10 12	Youth D.	Other	Yes


Question 12. Other Programs and Strategies-Non TUPE and SDFSC LEAs may implement programs, strategies, and activities with an Alcohol, Tobacco, Other Drug, or Violence prevention focus with funds other than Title IV SDFC or TUPE. Identify any of the programs, strategies, or activities used by the LEA during the 2004/05 school year and the grade spans targeted (does not require that 50% or more students be targeted or served).
Used?		Program/Activity/Strategy		Used at Grade Spans
Yes	No	Program/Activity/Strategy		K-6	7-8	9-12
√		A.	One or more sweeps using detection dogs.			√
	√	B.	Student drug testing under reasonable or probable cause.
√		C.	Mandatory random drug testing for students in extra-curricular activities.			√
	√	D.	Voluntary random drug testing for students not in extra-curricular activities.
√		E.	Character Education Programs: Resources and activities that build and develop character in youth defined by core values of trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, fairness, caring, citizenship, or other chosen character traits.			√
√		F.	Does the district participate in any alcohol, tobacco or other drug prevention projects operated by community based organizations that are funded by the county health, public health, or alcohol and drug program department?			√

Question 13. Staff Development
Report the number of classified and certificated staff served by the following staff-focused alcohol, tobacco, other drug, violence and youth development in-service in the past year. For example, if a violence prevention in-service was offered, check the violence box to the right, then on the same row, to the right, list the number of classified and/or certificated staff involved.

Activity	Yes	No	Focus	Estimate the number of Classified Staff Involved	Estimate the number of Certificated Staff Involved
A. Inservice specific to prevention			Tobacco
			Alcohol & Drug
	√		Violence	5	100
	√		Youth Development	5	100
B. Inservice specific to intervention or cessation	√		Tobacco	5	100
	√		Alcohol & Drug	5	100
	√		Violence	5	100


Question 14. Provide the best estimate of how many students, in all grades, received classroom-based tobacco use prevention instruction in 2005-2605. (Legislative reporting requires this question about tobacco only.)		500
Question 15. Estimate the number of students who have been specifically identified as tobacco users this year. Identify the number of these tobacco-using students who were served with special, targeted cessation and/or intervention services this year. If none, enter "0". (Legislative reporting requires this question about tobacco only.)
A.	Number of tobacco-using students identified:	40
B.	Number of tobacco-using students served with targeted cessation/intervention:	40
Note: if you served any students with targeted cessation/intervention (15B), you must answer 15C-15M below.

Intervention/Cessation Programs		Which predominant programs were used in 2006/07?		Used for Cessation Readiness or Pre-Cessation in 2006-07?		Used for Cessation in 2006-07?		Provided in Collaboration with a Community Health Agency?		To be Used in 2007/08?
Intervention/Cessation Programs		Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No
C.	California Smokers' Helpline	√			√	√			√	√
D.	Helping Teens Stop Using Tobacco (TAP)	√			√	√			√	√
E.	Intervening with Teen Tobacco Users (TEG)	√		√			√		√	√
F.	NOT-Not On Tobacco		√		√		√		√		√
G.	Smokeless School Days		√		√		√		√		√
H.	Freedom from Smaking		√		√		√		√		√
I.	I QUIT		√		√		√		√		√
J.	I Decide: Teen Tobacco Cessation Program		√		√		√		√		√
K.	Other:		√		√		√		√		√
L.	Other:		√		√		√		√		√
M.	Other:		√		√		√		√		√


Question 16. Tobacco prevention/intervention services for parenting or pregnant minors. If none, enter "0". (Legislative reporting requires this question about tobacco only.)
A.	Number of parenting and/or pregnant minors identified:	5
B.	Number of parenting and/or pregnant minors served:	5
B1.	Number of pregnant/parenting minors served in school based programs:	5
B2.	Number of pregnant/parenting minors referred to community programs:	4


Principle of Effectiveness: Program Evaluation Program shall be evaluated periodically to assess progress towards achieving goals and objectives, and use of the evaluation results to refine, improve, and strengthen the program and refine the goals and objectives as appropriate.
Question 17. Has your LEA's progress in meeting performance indicators (see question 3) been publicly reported in 2005/06 or 2006/07? MARK ONLY ONE
√	A. Do not yet have data on progress towards meeting goals.
	B. Have data on progress towards goals, but have not reported publicly yet.
	C. Have a date scheduled to publicly report data.
	D. Yes, we have publicly reported indicator progress.
Question 18. To what extent has your LEA used evaluation results to refine, improve, and strengthen the district's alcohol, other drug, and violence program? MARK ONLY ONE
	A. Great extent
√	B. Some extent
	C. Little thus far
	D. No data available

Question 18A	Yes	No
Have personnel from most of these schools reviewed their site specificdata regarding suspensions, expulsions, truancy, and/or California healthy Kids Survey findings as part of developing and/or annually updating their School Safety Plans?	√

Question 18B	Yes	No
In thier annual updates of their Single Plans for Student Achievement, do most of theSchool Site Councils include objectives for their SDFSC/TUPE programs and activities that are aligned with goals for student achievement and are based on analysis of data, including the CHKS and site specific data on suspensions, expulsions, and truancy?	√

Principle of Effectiveness: Parent Involvement Programs shall include meaningful and ongoing consultation with and input from parents in the development and administration of activities.
Question 19. In what ways were parents involved in planning and implementing prevention activities?
Yes	No	Parent Involvement Activities
√		A. Prevention planning committees
√		B. Classroom volunteers for prevention activities
√		C. Other volunteers in prevention activities
√		D. Other: Sober Grad parties


Principle of Effectiveness: Coordinated School Health The following questions address coordinated school health issues related to prevention and intervention.
Question 20. The eight components of coordinated school health are:
∙ Health education ∙ Health services ∙ Psychological and counseling services ∙ Health promotion for staff			∙ Physical education ∙ Nutrition services ∙ Healthy school environment ∙ Parent/community involvement
Yes	No
√		Has a committee or group met in the past year to discuss how to collaborate on the implmentation of two or more of these eight components?
20a. If "Yes", which components did the committee or group address or collaborate on?
Yes	No	Components
	√	A. Health education
	√	B. Health services
√		C. Psychological and counseling services
	√	D. Health promotion for staff
	√	E. Physical education
√		F. Nutrition services
	√	G. Healthy school environment
	√	H. Parent/community involvement
Question 21. Identify the predominant classroom-based resources addressing HIV/AIDS.
Yes	No	HIV/AIDS Resources-Mark either "None" (A), or "Yes" or "No" for each item
√		A. None

√		B. Locally developed resources: developed internally using content and/or combining elements from several external resources (names not needed)
√		C. Any textbook(s)-names not needed
	√	D. Be Proud. Be Responsible.
	√	E. Positive Prevention: HIV/STD Prevention Education for California Youth (2nd ed.)
	√	F. Focus on Kids
	√	G. Get Real About AIDS
	√	H. Safer Choices

2006 - 2007 California Healthy Kids Survey

2006-07 Annual Report for Oroville Union High-(61515)

Principle of Effectiveness: Conducting Needs Assessments

Principle of Effectiveness: Performance Measures

Principle of Effectiveness: Selecting Effective Research-validated Programs

Project SUCCESS-ATD Focus

Principle of Effectiveness: Program Evaluation

Principle of Effectiveness: Parent Involvement

Principle of Effectiveness: Coordinated School Health