|
2006 - 2007 California Healthy Kids Survey
2006-07 Annual Report for Oroville Union High-(61515)
|
|
|
What
funding did your LEA receive in 2006-07? |
|
|
Yes |
No |
Funding
Sources |
|
|
√ |
|
A. SDFSCA
Title IV Entitlement |
|
|
|
√ |
B. 4-8
TUPE Entitlement |
|
|
|
√ |
C. 6-8
TUPE Competitive Funds |
|
|
√ |
|
D. 9-12
TUPE Competitive Funds |
|
|
√ |
|
E. AB 1113 Safe Schools & Violence Prevention Act |
|
|
|
√ |
F. Rural
Educational Achievement Program (REAP) (Transfered 100% of your SDFSCA
Title IV funding to other programs). |
|
Principle of
Effectiveness: Conducting Needs Assessments
Programs shall be based on a thorough assessment of objective data about
drugs and violence, assets, and protective factors in schools and
communities served. |
|
Question 1 |
Yes |
No |
|
Based on
analysis of California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) and/or other locally
available data, has your program identified the most pressing alcohol,
tobacco, other drug and violence-related issues among your students? |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Question 2 |
Yes |
No |
|
Based on
analysis of CHKS resiliency and/or locally available data, has your
program identified program needs to improve youth development assets? |
√ |
|
|
size=2 width="100%" align=center>
Principle of
Effectiveness: Performance Measures
The
LEA shall establish performance measures and biennial (every two years)
goals aimed at ensuring safe, orderly and drug-free learning
environments. |
|
Question 3
This question relates to your current performance indicators. Your LEA
defined these in your most recently approved Local Education Agency Plan
(LEAP).
INDICATORS A-L MUST BE ADDRESSED.
With the exception of the Truancy Rate indicator, data to report on your
indicators is available from your California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS). |
|
|
Alcohol, Tobacco, Other Drug, Violence Prevention and Protective Factors
Performance Measures
--INDICATORS-- |
California
Healthy Kids Indicator Data |
Baseline Year
(LEAP) |
Biennial Goal
(LEAP)
% |
|
Consent
Grade |
active
01-02 |
active
02-03 |
active
03-04 |
04-05 |
05-06 |
06-07 |
|
A. |
The
percentage of students that have ever used cigarettes will
decrease biennially by: |
5th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
7th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
B. |
The
percentage of students that have used cigarettes within the past 30 days
will
decrease biennially by: |
7th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
9th |
18% |
NA |
12% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
-4% |
|
11th |
21% |
NA |
12% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
-4% |
|
NT |
56% |
NA |
29% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
-4% |
|
C. |
The
percentage of students that have ever used marijuana will
decrease biennially by: |
5th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
7th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
D. |
The
percentage of students that have used alcohol within the past 30 days
will
decrease biennially by: |
7th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
9th |
34% |
NA |
25% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
-5% |
|
11th |
40% |
NA |
33% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
-5% |
|
NT |
64% |
NA |
39% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
-5% |
|
E. |
The
percentage of students that have used marijuana within the past 30 days
will
decrease biennially by: |
7th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
9th |
21% |
NA |
11% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
-4% |
|
11th |
19% |
NA |
16% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
-4% |
|
NT |
65% |
NA |
26% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
-4% |
|
F. |
The
percentage of students that feel very safe at school will
increase biennially by:
Note: The response items for this indicator were revised in 2003/04. If
the baseline year for this indicator was prior to 2003/04, the
comparison from Baseline to Most Recent is invalid. |
5th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
7th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
9th |
|
|
9% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+4% |
|
11th |
|
|
10% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+4% |
|
NT |
|
|
31% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+4% |
|
Question 3--Continued
This question relates to your current performance indicators. Your LEA
defined these in your most recently approved Local Education Agency Plan
(LEAP).
INDICATORS A-L MUST BE ADDRESSED.
With the exception of the Truancy Rate indicator, data to report on your
indicators is available from your California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS). |
|
|
Alcohol, Tobacco, Other Drug, Violence Prevention and Protective Factors
Performance Measures
--INDICATORS-- |
California
Healthy Kids Indicator Data |
Baseline Year
(LEAP) |
Biennial Goal
(LEAP)
% |
|
Grade
Consent |
01-02
active |
02-03
active |
03-04
active |
04-05 |
05-06 |
06-07 |
|
G. |
The
percentage of students that have been afraid of being beaten up during
the past 12 months will
decrease biennially by: |
7th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
9th |
32% |
NA |
26% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
-4% |
|
11th |
16% |
NA |
21% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
-4% |
|
NT |
28% |
NA |
15% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
-4% |
|
H. |
The
percentage of students that report high levels of caring relationships
with a teacher or other adult at their school will
increase biennially by: |
5th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
7th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
9th |
NA |
NA |
27% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+5% |
|
11th |
NA |
NA |
42% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+5% |
|
NT |
NA |
NA |
38% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+5% |
|
I. |
The
percentage of students that report high levels of high expectations from
a teacher or other adult at their school will
increase biennially by: |
5th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
7th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
9th |
NA |
NA |
40% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+5% |
|
11th |
NA |
NA |
52% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+5% |
|
NT |
NA |
NA |
42% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+5% |
|
J. |
The
percentage of students that report high levels of opportunities for
meaningful participation at their school will
increase biennially by: |
5th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
7th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
9th |
NA |
NA |
16% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+5% |
|
11th |
NA |
NA |
18% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+5% |
|
NT |
NA |
NA |
15% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+5% |
|
Question 3--Continued
This question relates to your current performance indicators. Your LEA
defined these in your most recently approved Local Education Agency Plan
(LEAP).
INDICATORS A-L MUST BE ADDRESSED.
With the exception of the Truancy Rate indicator, data to report on your
indicators is available from your California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS). |
|
|
Alcohol, Tobacco, Other Drug, Violence Prevention and Protective Factors
Performance Measures
--INDICATORS-- |
California
Healthy Kids Indicator Data |
Baseline Year
(LEAP) |
Biennial Goal
(LEAP)
% |
|
Grade
Consent |
01-02
active |
02-03
active |
03-04
active |
04-05 |
05-06 |
06-07 |
|
K. |
The
percentage of students that report high levels of school connectedness
at their school will
increase biennially by: |
5th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
7th |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
9th |
NA |
NA |
28% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+5% |
|
11th |
NA |
NA |
41% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+5% |
|
NT |
NA |
NA |
28% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
01/02 |
+5% |
|
Truancy Performance Indicator
This is an
ANNUAL
indicator. |
Truancy Rates |
|
2003/04 Rate |
2004/05
Rate* |
2005/06
Rate* |
2006/07
Current Year
Rate* |
Annual
Goal |
|
|
L. |
The
percentage of students who have been truant will
decrease annually by: |
13 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
-3% |
|
|
*
Calculate the percentage rates in the LEA by tallying the number of
students who have been classified as truant during the school year per
Education Code Section 48260.5, and dividing the total by the CBEDS
enrollment for the same school year. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
section is for recording any performance indicators that were included
in your LEA Plan. You may leave this section blank if you do not have
any additional indicators or want to drop an indicator, or you may add
new indicators here if you wish. If you have an optional indicator,
please input it in the space provided using the pattern [indicator] will
[increase or decrease] [over what period: annually, biennially, etc.] by
some number or percentage. For example, "The expulsion rate will
decrease annually by" 2%. Also indicate the grade(s) or grade span for
the indicator (e.g. 5 or K-6 or 5,7,9,11), the goal, and the Baseline
and Most Recent year data. |
|
Additional (Optional) Performance Measures from LEA Plan
List Indicators below |
Grade(s) or Span |
Baseline Data |
Goal |
Most Recent Data |
|
Year |
#/% |
#/% |
Year |
#/% |
|
1. |
Percentage
of students reporting drinking 5 drinks within 2 hours in the last 30
days will decrease by 5% |
9-12 |
00/01 |
9th 22% 11th 30% |
5% |
04/05 |
9th 19% 11th 27% |
|
2. |
The
percentage of students reporting ever driving drunk or riding in a car
with someone who's been drinking will decrease by 10% |
9-12 |
00/01 |
9th 30% 11th 37% |
10% |
04/05 |
9th 25% 11th 35% |
|
3. |
The
percentage of students reporting having been harrassed will decrease by
5% |
9-12 |
00/01 |
9th 44% 11th 40% |
5% |
04/05 |
9th 21% 11th 20% |
|
4. |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question 4 |
Yes |
No |
|
Were the
biennial goals (listed in Question 3) established with input from
appropriate school, community, and parent representatives and did these
representatives also review whether these goals were achieved? |
√ |
|
|
Question 5 |
|
|
|
What steps
were taken to review research or local evaluation data which influenced
the selection of prevention activities for 2006-2007? (Check all that
apply) |
Yes |
No |
|
A. |
Attended
workshops and conferences addressing research-validated strategies |
√ |
|
|
B. |
Discussed
options with a county office of education TUPE/SDFSCA coordinator |
√ |
|
|
C. |
Discussed
options with County Health Agencies |
√ |
|
|
D. |
Examined
evaluation data for our programs for evidence of effectiveness |
√ |
|
|
E. |
Talked
with staff from other LEAs who have conducted the activities being
considered |
√ |
|
|
F. |
Utilized
Getting Results: Developing Safe and Healthy Kids |
√ |
|
|
G. |
Utilized
the California Healthy Kids Resource Center web site |
√ |
|
|
H. |
Other
(describe) National list servs OSDFS and SAMHSA |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question 6 |
|
|
|
What
technical assistance is still needed to better implement effective,
science-based alcohol, tobacco, other drug, violence prevention, and
youth development programs? (Check all that apply) |
Yes |
No |
|
A. |
Better
networking with other districts |
|
√ |
|
B. |
Better
networking with our county office of education |
|
√ |
|
C. |
More
support for prevention from district staff, parents, community, etc. |
√ |
|
|
D. |
More
access to research and evaluation on prevention strategies |
|
√ |
|
E. |
Other
(describe) How to sustain programs with decreasing state and federal
funding |
√ |
|
|
F. |
Other
(describe) How to sustain programs in light of academic success
standards focus |
√ |
|
|
size=2 width="100%" align=center>
Principle of
Effectiveness: Selecting Effective Research-validated Programs
Agencies shall design and implement activities based on research or
evaluation that provides evidence that the strategies used prevent or
reduce drug use, violence, or disruptive behavior.
|
|
Question 7 |
|
Use this section to identify the
predominant science-based prevention programs used by
your LEA.
∙ Identify only
predominant programs, defined as being used with at
least 50 percent of the students at targeted grade level(s).
∙ Check the grade levels in which at least 50 percent of the students
received the program.
∙ Indicate the total number students (across all grade levels indicated)
that received the program.
∙ Check the funding source(s) for each program. |
|
Project
SUCCESS-ATD Focus
|
|
Target Grade(s)
grades at which 50% of students received |
Targeted Population
total number of students received |
Funding
check all that apply |
Fidelity
check all that apply |
|
9 |
400 |
SDFSC TUPE 9+ Other |
Training Documentation Checklists |
|
|
|
|
|
Question 8 |
Yes |
No |
|
Do you
plan any changes in science-based programs, or grade level
implementation for 2007-08? |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
Question 9.
Promising Program waiver granted by State Board of Education
Our records indicate that your LEA has not been granted any
waiver to fund Promising Programs using SDFCA funds. If you have
any questions about the waiver process or identification
numbers, please contact the Safe and Healthy Kids Program Office
at the California Department of Education at (916) 319-0920.
|
|
Question 10. Support Strategies and Activities
Use this section to identify any TUPE Innovative Prevention
Programs. Although these programs are on the Promising Programs
list, they may be supported with TUPE funds without seeking a
waiver.
∙ Identify only
predominant programs, as defined as being used
with at least 50 percent of the students at the targeted grade
level(s). For example, if program xyz is provided to over 50
percent of your students in grades 5 and 6, check 5 and 6 and
list the number of students served. If the program is not
provided to at least 50 percent of the students in any grade, do
not list it.
∙ Check the grade levels in which at least 50 percent of the
students received the program.
∙ Indicate the total number students (across all grade levels
indicated) that received the program.
∙ Check the funding source(s) for each program. |
|
Innovative Programs/Focus |
2006/07 Information |
2007/08 Information |
|
Used During 06/07? |
Targeted Grade(s)
grades at which 50% of students received* |
Targeted Population
total number of students received |
Funding
check all that apply |
To Be Used During 07/08? |
Planned Implement-
ation Date
date it will be provided to students |
|
A.
Basement Bums, Focus: T |
No |
|
|
|
No |
NA |
|
B.
Personal/Social Skills Lessons, Focus: T |
No |
|
|
|
No |
NA |
|
C.
Project Alive, Focus: T |
No |
|
|
|
No |
NA |
|
D.
Project Life, Focus: T |
No |
|
|
|
No |
NA |
|
E.
Project SCAT, Focus: T |
No |
|
|
|
No |
NA |
|
F.
Smokeless School Days, Focus: T |
No |
|
|
|
No |
NA |
|
G. Teens
Tackle Tobacco (TTT), Focus: T |
No |
|
|
|
No |
NA |
|
H.
Tobacco Free Generations, Focus: T |
No |
|
|
|
No |
NA |
|
Question 11. Research based Activities and Strategies
Identify the additional strategies and activities used to
support your primary prevention and intervention programs. These
include any changes utilized primarily outside the classroom
setting, although small components could be classroom-based.
These activities and strategies are the categories in Appendix D
of the LEAP.
∙ Identify only
predominant programs, as defined as at least 50
percent of the students at certain grade level(s) having access.
For example, if program xyz is accessible to over 50 percent of
your students in grades 5 and 6, check 5 and 6. If the program
is not accessible than 50 percent of the students in any grade,
do not list it.
∙ Check the grade levels in which at least 50 percent of the
students had access the program.
∙ Check the funding source(s) for each program. |
|
Research Based Activities
Listed in Appendix D of the LEAP and in
Getting Results-available at:
www.gettingresults.com |
2006/07 Information |
2007/08 |
|
Used During 06/07? |
Targeted Grade(s)
grades at which 50% of students had access |
ATODVYD Focus |
Funding
check all that apply |
To Be Used During 06/07? |
|
A. After School Program
Getting Results Part I pp 77-78. |
No |
|
|
|
No |
|
B. Conflict Mediation/Resolution
Getting Results Part I pp. 63-65 and 127-129. |
Yes |
9 10 11 |
Violence Youth D. |
SDFSC Other |
Yes |
|
C. Early Intervention & Counseling
Getting Results Part I pp. 72, 100-101, 106-107. |
Yes |
9 10 11 12 |
Alcohol Tobacco O Drug Violence Youth D. |
SDFSC TUPE 9+ Other |
Yes |
|
D. Environmental Strategies
Getting Part I pp. 73-74, Part II pp. 47-48, 76-79, 89-94. |
No |
|
|
|
No |
|
E. Family and Community Collaboration
Getting Results Part I pp. 104-105, Part II pp. 26-28, 33. |
Yes |
9 10 11 12 |
Alcohol Tobacco O Drug Violence Youth D. |
SDFSC TUPE 9+ Other |
Yes |
|
F. Media Literacy and Advocacy
Getting Results Part II p. 45, Update 3 pp 22-24. |
Yes |
9 10 11 12 |
Tobacco |
SDFSC TUPE 9+ Other |
Yes |
|
G. Mentoring
Getting Results Part I p. 49. |
No |
|
|
|
No |
|
H. Peer-Helping and Peer Leaders
Getting Results Part I pp. 104-107, Update 3 pp. 43-45. |
Yes |
9 10 11 12 |
Violence Youth D. |
Other |
Yes |
|
I. Positive Alternatives
Getting Results Part I pp. 79-81, 104-106, 108-109. |
Yes |
9 10 11 12 |
Alcohol Tobacco O Drug Violence Youth D. |
SDFSC TUPE 9+ Other |
Yes |
|
J. School Policies
Getting Results Part I pp. 66-72, Part II pp. 22-23. |
Yes |
9 10 11 12 |
Alcohol Tobacco O Drug Violence Youth D. |
SDFSC TUPE 9+ AB 1113 Other |
Yes |
|
K. Service Learning/Community Service
Getting Results Part I pp. 81-82, Part II pp. 46-47. |
No |
|
|
|
No |
|
L. Student Assistance Programs
Getting Results pp. 72, 89-90. |
Yes |
9 10 11 12 |
Alcohol Tobacco O Drug Violence Youth D. |
SDFSC TUPE 9+ Other |
Yes |
|
M. Tobacco-Use Cessation
Getting Results Part II pp. 28, 42-43, 72-74. |
Yes |
9 10 12 |
Tobacco |
TUPE 9+ |
Yes |
|
N. Youth Development/Caring Schools/Caring Classroom
Getting Results Part I pp. 121-123, 136-137, Part II p. 28, and
Update I. |
Yes |
9 10 12 |
Youth D. |
Other |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question 12. Other Programs and Strategies-Non TUPE and SDFSC
LEAs may implement programs, strategies, and activities with an
Alcohol, Tobacco, Other Drug, or Violence prevention focus with
funds other than Title IV SDFC or TUPE. Identify any of the
programs, strategies, or activities used by the LEA during the
2004/05 school year and the grade spans targeted (does not
require that 50% or more students be targeted or served). |
|
Used? |
Program/Activity/Strategy |
Used at Grade Spans |
|
Yes |
No |
K-6 |
7-8 |
9-12 |
|
√ |
|
A. |
One or
more sweeps using detection dogs. |
|
|
√ |
|
|
√ |
B. |
Student
drug testing under reasonable or probable cause. |
|
|
|
|
√ |
|
C. |
Mandatory random drug testing for students in extra-curricular
activities. |
|
|
√ |
|
|
√ |
D. |
Voluntary random drug testing for students not in
extra-curricular activities. |
|
|
|
|
√ |
|
E. |
Character Education Programs: Resources and activities that
build and develop character in youth defined by core values of
trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, fairness, caring,
citizenship, or other chosen character traits. |
|
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
F. |
Does the
district participate in any alcohol, tobacco or other drug
prevention projects operated by community based organizations
that are funded by the county health, public health, or alcohol
and drug program department? |
|
|
√ |
|
Question 13. Staff Development
Report the number of classified and certificated staff served by
the following staff-focused alcohol, tobacco, other drug,
violence and youth development in-service in the past year. For
example, if a violence prevention in-service was offered, check
the violence box to the right, then on the same row, to the
right, list the number of classified and/or certificated staff
involved. |
|
Activity |
Yes |
No |
Focus |
Estimate the number of Classified Staff Involved |
Estimate the number of Certificated Staff Involved |
|
A. Inservice specific to prevention |
|
|
Tobacco |
|
|
|
|
|
Alcohol
& Drug |
|
|
|
√ |
|
Violence |
5 |
100 |
|
√ |
|
Youth
Development |
5 |
100 |
|
B. Inservice specific to intervention or cessation |
√ |
|
Tobacco |
5 |
100 |
|
√ |
|
Alcohol
& Drug |
5 |
100 |
|
√ |
|
Violence |
5 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question 14.
Provide the best estimate of how many students, in all grades,
received classroom-based tobacco use prevention instruction in
2005-2605.
(Legislative reporting requires this question about tobacco
only.) |
500 |
|
Question 15.
Estimate the number of students who have been specifically
identified as tobacco users this year. Identify the number of
these tobacco-using students who were served with special,
targeted cessation and/or intervention services this year. If
none, enter "0".
(Legislative reporting requires this question about tobacco
only.) |
|
A. |
Number
of tobacco-using students identified: |
40 |
|
B. |
Number
of tobacco-using students served with targeted
cessation/intervention: |
40 |
|
Note: if you served any students with targeted
cessation/intervention (15B), you must answer 15C-15M below. |
|
Intervention/Cessation Programs |
Which predominant programs were used in 2006/07? |
Used for Cessation Readiness or Pre-Cessation in 2006-07? |
Used for Cessation in 2006-07? |
Provided in Collaboration with a Community Health Agency? |
To be Used in 2007/08? |
|
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
C. |
California
Smokers' Helpline |
√ |
|
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
D. |
Helping
Teens Stop Using Tobacco (TAP) |
√ |
|
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
E. |
Intervening with Teen Tobacco Users (TEG) |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
√ |
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
F. |
NOT-Not
On Tobacco |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
G. |
Smokeless School Days |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
H. |
Freedom
from Smaking |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
I. |
I QUIT |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
J. |
I
Decide: Teen Tobacco Cessation Program |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
K. |
Other: |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
L. |
Other: |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
M. |
Other: |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question 16.
Tobacco prevention/intervention services for parenting or
pregnant minors. If none, enter "0".
(Legislative reporting requires this question about tobacco
only.) |
|
A. |
Number
of parenting and/or pregnant minors
identified: |
5 |
|
B. |
Number
of parenting and/or pregnant minors
served: |
5 |
|
B1. |
Number
of pregnant/parenting minors
served in school based programs: |
5 |
|
B2. |
Number
of pregnant/parenting minors
referred to community programs: |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principle of Effectiveness: Program Evaluation
Program shall be evaluated periodically to assess progress
towards achieving goals and objectives, and use of the
evaluation results to refine, improve, and strengthen the
program and refine the goals and objectives as appropriate. |
|
Question 17.
Has your LEA's progress in meeting performance indicators (see
question 3) been publicly reported in 2005/06 or 2006/07?
MARK ONLY ONE |
|
√ |
A. Do
not yet have data on progress towards meeting goals. |
|
|
B. Have
data on progress towards goals, but have not reported publicly
yet. |
|
|
C. Have
a date scheduled to publicly report data. |
|
|
D. Yes,
we have publicly reported indicator progress. |
|
Question 18.
To what extent has your LEA used evaluation results to refine,
improve, and strengthen the district's alcohol, other drug, and
violence program?
MARK ONLY ONE |
|
|
A. Great
extent |
|
√ |
B. Some
extent |
|
|
C.
Little thus far |
|
|
D. No
data available |
|
Question 18A |
Yes |
No |
|
Have
personnel from most of these schools reviewed their site
specificdata regarding suspensions, expulsions, truancy, and/or
California healthy Kids Survey findings as part of developing
and/or annually updating their School Safety Plans? |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Question 18B |
Yes |
No |
|
In thier
annual updates of their Single Plans for Student Achievement, do
most of theSchool Site Councils include objectives for their
SDFSC/TUPE programs and activities that are aligned with goals
for student achievement and are based on analysis of data,
including the CHKS and site specific data on suspensions,
expulsions, and truancy? |
√ |
|
|
Principle of Effectiveness: Parent Involvement
Programs shall include meaningful and ongoing consultation with
and input from parents in the development and administration of
activities. |
|
|
Question 19.
In what ways were parents involved in planning and implementing
prevention activities? |
|
|
Yes |
No |
Parent Involvement Activities |
|
√ |
|
A.
Prevention planning committees |
|
√ |
|
B.
Classroom volunteers for prevention activities |
|
√ |
|
C. Other
volunteers in prevention activities |
|
√ |
|
D.
Other: Sober Grad parties |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principle of Effectiveness: Coordinated School Health
The following questions address coordinated school health issues
related to prevention and intervention. |
|
Question 20.
The eight components of coordinated school health are:
|
|
∙ Health
education
∙ Health services
∙ Psychological and counseling services
∙ Health promotion for staff |
∙
Physical education
∙ Nutrition services
∙ Healthy school environment
∙ Parent/community involvement |
|
Yes |
No |
|
|
√ |
|
Has a
committee or group met in the past year to discuss how to
collaborate on the implmentation of two or more of these eight
components? |
|
20a.
If "Yes", which components did the committee or group address or
collaborate on? |
|
Yes |
No |
Components |
|
|
√ |
A.
Health education |
|
|
√ |
B.
Health services |
|
√ |
|
C.
Psychological and counseling services |
|
|
√ |
D.
Health promotion for staff |
|
|
√ |
E.
Physical education |
|
√ |
|
F.
Nutrition services |
|
|
√ |
G.
Healthy school environment |
|
|
√ |
H.
Parent/community involvement |
|
Question 21.
Identify the predominant classroom-based resources addressing
HIV/AIDS. |
|
Yes |
No |
HIV/AIDS Resources-Mark
either "None" (A), or "Yes" or "No" for each item |
|
√ |
|
A. None |
|
|
|
√ |
|
B.
Locally developed resources: developed internally using content
and/or combining elements from several external resources (names
not needed) |
|
√ |
|
C. Any
textbook(s)-names not needed |
|
|
√ |
D. Be
Proud. Be Responsible. |
|
|
√ |
E.
Positive Prevention: HIV/STD Prevention Education for California
Youth (2nd ed.) |
|
|
√ |
F. Focus
on Kids |
|
|
√ |
G. Get
Real About AIDS |
|
|
√ |
H. Safer
Choices |
|
|