School Accountability Report Card
School Year 2001-2002

School Information

District Information

 School Name

 Oroville High

 District Name

 Oroville Union High

 Principal

 Ed Loman

 Superintendent

  Dr. Oran Roberts

 Street

 1535 Bridge St.

 Street

 2211 Washington Ave.

 City, State, Zip

 Oroville, CA    95966-5060

 City, State, Zip

 Oroville, CA    95966-5440

 Phone Number

  530-538-2320

 Phone Number

  530-538-2300

 FAX Number

  530-534-6204

 FAX Number

  530-538-5327

 Web Site

  www.ouhsd.org/ohs/

 Web Site

  www.ouhsd.org

 Email Address

  eloman@ouhsd.org

 Email Address

  oroberts@ouhsd.org

 CDS Code

 04-61515-0435602

 SARC Contact

  Ed Loman

School Description and Mission Statement

 Introduction to the Community

Oroville High School (OHS) is located in Oroville in the County of Butte. The high school has 1027 students, grades nine through twelve. OHS is one of four high schools in the Oroville Union High School District. Established in 1892, our school is rich in tradition. Many prominent county citizens are OHS alumni.

The district draws students from an area of approximately 663 square miles and from seven different elementary districts. The principle community within the district’s boundaries, Oroville, has an immediate shopping population of approximately 50,000. The primary industries in Oroville are government (including education), retail trade, service industries, light manufacturing, agriculture, and lumbering. The median household income in Oroville is $16,614.

 Opportunities for higher education are plentiful. Butte Community College offers comprehensive programs in many fields. California State University, Chico, a four-year college that offers a full spectrum of curricula, is about a 25-minute drive from Oroville. Furthermore, Oroville is about three hours from the cultural centers of San Francisco and the Bay area and just about two hours from Reno, Tahoe, and Sacramento.

Oroville High School Vision & Mission Statement

Oroville High School Mission Statement: Oroville High School is a safe, engaging environment that promotes individual and cooperative efforts through optimum student-teacher-parent and community effort on campus, with high expectations for a diverse student population.

 Oroville High School's guiding vision is to prepare our students for success in our rapidly changing information-based society and to make sound, informed, ethical decisions in all aspects of their adult lives. We offer quality programs to help our students succeed. Courses, curriculum, and school-wide goals at Oroville High School are reviewed and aligned regularly with local, state and national standards. Our students learn how to be critical thinkers, life-long learners, effective communicators, and community contributors 

Opportunities for Parental Involvement

 Contact Person Name

  Jaylene Schafsteck

 Contact Person Phone Number

530-533-6473

Communication between school and home is a priority at OHS. Prior to the beginning of school, parent letters are mailed home to each parent inviting them to become involved in various decision-making groups on campus, such as: School Site Council, Parent Teacher Association (PTA), Boosters/Foundation Support Group, district discipline committee, school board membership and staff interview involvement. At the Back-To-School Night, the Principal’s presentation includes an invitation to all parents to get involved in OHS in anyway they feel comfortable. Our principal explains the variety of opportunities for parents to contribute to our students' and our schools' success, such as: committees, extra-curricular activities, clubs, advisory committees, PTA, project/service-based learning and /or business related mentorship programs. Teachers also solicit parent participation as needed. Generally, we get about 30% of our parents volunteering in various ways at the school each year.

Parents who request to be involved on campus are encouraged by staff to visit classes, chaperone field trips, provide transportation, join committees, assist in athletic programs, form parent or support clubs and attend board meetings. OHS parents often fill needed coaching positions; currently, two parents serve as coaches.  Parents join students and staff twice a year for campus beautification days where they donate and plant shrubs and flowers as well as clean the campus.

This year we opened a new avenue for parent and community involvement with the implementation of a Leadership Team comprised of parents, students, administrators, and teachers to serve as the governing body for Oroville High School. In addition, an Alternative Screening Panel, which includes an administrator, staff, and parents, meets weekly to make recommendations for students and appropriate placement in district programs. Parents also had opportunities to give input on Oroville High School’s ESLRs, through the WASC focus groups, Leadership Team, and School Site Council. 

OHS has a comprehensive system for communicating with parents and the community. OHS school newsletters are developed and mailed once every six weeks to parents and students that include current events and activities taking place at the OHS campus. The OHS website (http://www.ouhsd.org/ohs/) is used to communicate daily and weekly bulletin information to parents, students, and faculty.  Several staff members serve as interpreters for parents whose home language is other than English. Instructional Aide, Mai Vang interprets information for the Asian students and parents while Spanish Teacher Kevin Simas translates for the Spanish speaking population.

I. Demographic Information

Student Enrollment, by Grade Level

 Grade Level

 Enrollment

 Grade 9

279 

 Grade 10

278 

 Grade 11

264 

 Grade 12

205 

 Total

1026 

 Student Enrollment, by Ethnic Group
The percentage of students is the number of students in a racial/ethnic category divided by the school's most recent California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS) total enrollment.

 Racial/Ethnic Category

 Number
of
Students

 Percentage
of
Students

 Racial/Ethnic Category

 Number
of
Students

 Percentage
of
Students

 African-American

42 

4.1 

 Hispanic or Latino

58 

5.7 

 American Indian or Alaska Native

50 

4.9 

 Pacific Islander

0.6 

 Asian-American

245 

23.9 

 White (Not Hispanic)

623 

60.7 

 Filipino-American

0.2 

 Other

0.0 

 II. School Safety and Climate for Learning

School Safety Plan

 Date of Last Review/Update

  September 2002

 Date Last Discussed with Staff

  November 2002

 OHS actively promotes a safe, clean, and orderly learning environment and has a comprehensive disaster and safety plan in place. Based on our recent safety survey, the majority of students feel safe at Oroville High School.  We are currently beginning a program of ID badges for all students and staff in an attempt to ensure that only members of our school community are present on our campus. We have two campus security supervisors, equipped with communication devices, golf carts, and bicycles for patrol. Involve the leadership team in school safety issues; this should include communication concerning, and staff training for, safety and violence incidences, including notification of staff regarding students with a record of violence that could affect classroom management. 

 The school is continually striving for an improved atmosphere.  We have a campus beautification committee that takes care of landscaping improvement.  The Student Body Association assumes responsibility for cleaning the student break area, and after events.  In addition, each class in the homecoming celebration assumes responsibility for cleaning an area of the school.  Homecoming and Spirit week includes a community service project that is performed by each of the classes.  There are frequent projects that are integrated into the curriculum, performed by various classes, which improve the campus.  For example, ROP students return from their program in the afternoon to landscape on campus.  Many clubs, such as Friday Night Live, regularly perform community service activities.  Student artwork displayed in the Library Student Art Gallery, office, and the hall display cases beautify the school while expressing pride in student work.

This year we are enacting a LINK program that assimilates freshmen into the school community through mentoring and advanced orientation, conducted by Junior and Senior student volunteers.  It helps to ease new student entry into high school and limit alienation and fear of the secondary school environment.

The school has programs to avert violence; students are identified and referred to Drug & Alcohol counseling, Anger Management class, and Conflict Management Class.  We have various campus programs that encourage students to participate in healthy, safe activities.  Friday Night Live, Every 15 Minutes, Unity Day, Sober Graduation, and an extensive extracurricular activity program contribute to a safe student community.  We have school assemblies that incorporate motivational speakers and programs addressing student emotional issues.

There is a progressive discipline plan in place for ensuring attendance.  It includes positive intervention, counseling, home visits, and family services referrals.  The school works actively to involve the juvenile justice program in habitual attendance problems.  We have an in-school suspension program and are currently developing a Saturday school disciplinary program.

We believe that our school has benefited from the state and federally funded class-size reduction programs and that these programs have contributed to safer classroom environments.

The existing system used to notify teachers of a student's physical or learning disability, critical medical history, or history of violence toward other students or adults is cumbersome and does not provide timely information. Student records are flagged, but it is not easy for teachers to acquire the detailed information that caused the record to be flagged in the first place. It would be of benefit to both the student and the teachers to facilitate teacher access to sensitive student information that could affect classroom management.

Our staff shares high expectations for all OHS students and a personal commitment to improving our school. The teachers collaborate on school improvement issues as a whole as well as in their individual departments.  The II/USP process is helping the entire staff to cohesively focus on school improvement; quarterly exams, standards essays, and assessment pieces help to create a culture of high expectations, especially in the English and Math departments. Other departments will review and align their curriculum as it comes up for their scheduled review. In addition, our current WASC self study has united all stakeholders in a collaborative effort to help identify and plan programs and processes to improve student learning. Since fall 2001, time and resources have been set aside monthly for the Leadership Team (reps. from all stakeholders) and the entire staff to create a school wide action plan based on school data we gathered and analyzed.  

School Programs and Practices that Promote a Positive Learning Environment

Academic Programs for Students

OHS offers many academic support services and activities to help our diverse student population meet the challenges of a rigorous curriculum and accomplish our ESLRs. Such program include:

•         Advanced Placement and Honors courses     

•         Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID)

•         Special Education (RSP & SD)

•         English Language Learners 

•         Link Crew

•         Tutoring Programs

OHS instructional staff plays a major role in connecting students to appropriate academic support services to enhance classroom learning. A majority of the teachers assess their students’ learning needs informally or formally at the beginning of the school year as well as formatively throughout the school year. They use these assessments to modify their instruction and/or instructional strategies to maximize student learning throughout the course and to recommend tutoring if necessary.  

Co-Curricular Activities

At OHS approximately 8 out of 10 students are involved in school clubs, athletics, and extra-curricular school activities. A full range of sports programs are offered with certified coaching staff. Athletes are expected to maintain appropriate grade point averages and are closely monitored by coaching staff.  In addition to typical high school sports programs, off campus sporting activities are also recognized, such as the ski/snowboarding club.  An active Associated Student Body (ASB), advised by a certificated teacher and staffed with 14 OHS students oversees the operation of 30 clubs on campus. These clubs service a wide variety of social and school interests to serve our diverse student population and also foster community involvement and service.  Examples of such clubs are Key Club, Environmental Club, Friday Night Live, Future Business Leaders of America (FBLA), Black Student Union, Asian Club, International Club, Girls and Boys Block "O", Students Taking A New Direction (STAND), Vocational Industrial Clubs of America (VICA), Fashion Club, Spirit Squads, Link Crew, FHA-HERO club, grade-level clubs, Catering Club, and the LP/Oroville Band. Several of these clubs are tied with state and national organizations. 

Several activities are also supported within the curriculum, such as the school newspaper, yearbook, and the OHS web site, all of which are produced and advised during scheduled designated courses. The school newspaper, Eye of the Tiger, is published once a month and provides students with information about staff, classes, programs, activities of students and clubs, counseling information, student opinion, events, entertainment and sports.

Suspensions and Expulsions
The number of suspensions and expulsions is the total number of incidents that result in a suspension or expulsion. The rate of suspensions and expulsions is the total number of incidents divided by the school's California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS) total enrollment for the given year. In unified school districts, a comparison between a particular type of school (elementary, middle, high) and the district average may be misleading. Schools have the option of comparing their data with the district-wide average for the same type of school.

 

 School

 District

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 Suspensions (number)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Suspensions (rate)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Expulsions (number)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Expulsions (rate)

 

 

 

 

 

 

School Facilities

Oroville High School has been updating the training of our campus custodians. With old buildings, up-keep is a challenge however as a result of a recent bond passage and several buildings on campus qualifying for modernization improvements to current facilities will occur this year. This past year the floors in the S-Wing classrooms were replaced and three additional relocatables were added to the campus to allow for future growth. A monthly maintenance check for safety and repairs is reported. The school has a safety committee that meets to discuss safety hazards, promote accident prevention and provide safety awareness and training.
 


III. Academic Data

Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)
Through the California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, students in grades 2-11 are tested annually in various subject areas. Currently, the STAR program includes California Standards Tests (CST) in English Language Arts and Mathematics in grades 2-11, and Science and History-Social Science in grades 9-11; and the Stanford Achievement Test, Ninth Edition (Stanford 9), which tests Reading, Language, Mathematics (grades 2-11), Spelling (grades 2-8), and Science and History-Social Science (grades 9-11 only). Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

California Standards Tests (CST)
The California Standards Tests show how well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. Student scores are reported as performance levels. The five performance levels are Advanced (exceeds state standards), Proficient (meets standards), Basic (approaching standards), Below Basic (below standards), and Far Below Basic (well below standards). Students scoring at the Proficient or Advanced level have met state standards in that content area. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

CST - English Language Arts
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 9

 --- 

  19

  23

 --- 

  22

  26

 --- 

 28

 33

 10

 --- 

  30

  21

 --- 

  26

  25

 --- 

 31

 33

 11

 --- 

  13

  27

 --- 

  18

  26

 --- 

 29

 31


CST - Mathematics
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 9

 --- 

 --- 

 24

 --- 

 --- 

 19

 --- 

 --- 

 22

 10

 --- 

 --- 

 21

 --- 

 --- 

 22

 --- 

 --- 

 21

 11

 --- 

 --- 

 14

 --- 

 --- 

 17

 --- 

 --- 

 18


CST - Science
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 9

 --- 

 --- 

 44

 --- 

 --- 

 44

 --- 

 --- 

 33

 10

 --- 

 --- 

 28

 --- 

 --- 

 33

 --- 

 --- 

 31

 11

 --- 

 --- 

 34

 --- 

 --- 

 33

 --- 

 --- 

 28


CST - History/Social Science
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 9

 --- 

 --- 

 23

 --- 

 --- 

 23

 --- 

 --- 

 24

 10

 --- 

 --- 

 16

 --- 

 --- 

 22

 --- 

 --- 

 24

 11

 --- 

 --- 

 25

 --- 

 --- 

 25

 --- 

 --- 

 32


CST - Subgroups - English Language Arts
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

Grade
Level

 Male 

Female

English
Learners

Not-English
Learners

Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Migrant
Education
Services

 9

 15

 30

 0

 27

 12

  35

  11

 10

 14

 29

 0

 23

 17

  25

  23

 11

 21

 33

 0

 28

 15

  35

  17

CST - Subgroups - Mathematics
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

Grade
Level

 Male 

Female

English
Learners

Not-English
Learners

Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Migrant
Education
Services

 9

 21

 26

 17

  25

  21

  27

  44

 10

 19

 23

 22

  21

  22

  21

  20

 11

 14

 13

 9

  14

  10

  16

  9


CST - Subgroups - Science
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

Grade
Level

 Male 

Female

English
Learners

Not-English
Learners

Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Migrant
Education
Services

 9

  49

  39

  22

  47

  34

  53

  33

 10

  26

  30

  5

  30

  26

  30

  28

 11

  35

  34

  8

  37

  28

  39

  43


CST - Subgroups - History/Social Science
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

Grade
Level

 Male 

Female

English
Learners

Not-English
Learners

Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

Migrant
Education
Services

 9

  47

  40

  17

  47

  32

  53

  29

 10

  26

  29

  9

  31

  24

  31

  27

 11

  34

  30

  0

  36

  26

  39

  36


CST - Racial/Ethnic Groups - English Language Arts
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 African-
American

 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native

 Asian-
American

 Filipino-
American

 Hispanic
or Latino

 Pacific
Islander

 White
(not
Hispanic)

 Other

 9

  20

  20

  10

 

  11

 

  29

 

 10

  0

  0

  15

 

  22

 

  25

 

 11

  0

  29

  16

 

  10

 

  35

 

CST - Racial/Ethnic Groups - Mathematics
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 African-
American

 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native

 Asian-
American

 Filipino-
American

 Hispanic
or Latino

 Pacific
Islander

 White
(not
Hispanic)

 Other

 9

  20

  19

  31

 

  21

 

  23

 

 10

  33

  0

  21

 

  0

 

  21

 

 11

  20

  25

  5

 

  0

 

  17

 


CST - Racial/Ethnic Groups - Science
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 African-
American

 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native

 Asian-
American

 Filipino-
American

 Hispanic
or Latino

 Pacific
Islander

 White
(not
Hispanic)

 Other

 9

  29

  42

  30

 

  36

 

  50

 

 10

  25

  14

  23

 

  50

 

  30

 

 11

  0

  25

  31

 

  14

 

  40

 


CST - Racial/Ethnic Groups - History/Social Science
Percentage of students achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state standard)

 Grade
Level

 African-
American

 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native

 Asian-
American

 Filipino-
American

 Hispanic
or Latino

 Pacific
Islander

 White
(not
Hispanic)

 Other

 9

  38

  46

  26

 

  40

 

  50

 

 10

  33

  25

  21

 

  43

 

  31

 

 11

  0

  40

  29

 

  13

 

  39

 


Stanford 9 (SAT 9)
Reading and mathematics results from the Stanford 9 test are reported for each grade level as the percentage of tested students scoring at or above the 50th percentile (the national average). School results are compared to results at the district and state levels. Note: To protect student privacy, scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less.

SAT 9 - Reading
Percentage of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 9

 31

 24

 28

 29

 27

 29

 35

 35

 34

 10

 22

 28

 19

 24

 30

 25

 34

 34

 34

 11

 34

 22

 27

 32

 27

 31

 36

 37

 37

SAT 9 - Mathematics
Percentage of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile

 Grade
Level

 School

 District

 State

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 9

 43

 49

 51

 47

 49

 49

 51

 51

 52

 10

 37

 44

 40

 38

 42

 45

 46

 45

 46

 11

 41

 35

 41

 43

 37

 42

 47

 46

 47

SAT 9 - Subgroups - Reading
Percentage of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile

 Grade
Level

   Male  

 Female

 English
Learners

 Not-English
Learners

 Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

 Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

 Migrant
Education
Services

 9

 24

 31

 0

 32

 16

 39

 

 10

 12

 27

 5

 20

 12

 25

 10

 11

 24

 31

 0

 29

 13

 36

 13

SAT 9 - Subgroups - Mathematics
Percentage of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile

 Grade
Level

   Male  

 Female

 English
Learners

 Not-English
Learners

 Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

 Not
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged

 Migrant
Education
Services

 9

 49

 53

 47

 52

 44

 57

 

 10

 35

 45

 14

 42

 34

 45

 27

 11

 41

 41

 0

 44

 38

 43

 50

SAT 9 - Racial/Ethnic Groups - Reading
Percentage of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile

 Grade
Level

 African-
American

 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native

 Asian-
American

 Filipino-
American

 Hispanic
or Latino

 Pacific
Islander

 White
(not
Hispanic)

 Other

 9

 

 20

 6

 

 24

 

 37

 

 10

 

 

 10

 

 

 

 24

 

 11

 

 

 8

 

 

 

 39

 

SAT 9 - Racial/Ethnic Groups - Mathematics
Percentage of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile

 Grade
Level

 African-
American

 American
Indian or
Alaska
Native

 Asian-
American

 Filipino-
American

 Hispanic
or Latino

 Pacific
Islander

 White
(not
Hispanic)

 Other

 9

 

 40

 61

 

 35

 

 53

 

 10

 

 

 36

 

 

 

 41

 

 11

 21

 

 38

 

 

 

 44

 

School Wide API

 API Base Data

 API Growth Data

 

 1999

 2000

 2001

 

From
1999
to 2000

From
2000
to 2001

From
2001
to 2002

 Percentage Tested

 85

 94

 99

 Percentage Tested

 94

 98

 100

 API Base Score

 571

 586

 590

 API Growth Score

 566

 587

 594

 Growth Target

 11

 11

 11

 Actual Growth

 -5

 1

 4

 Statewide Rank

 4

 4

 4

 

 Similar Schools Rank

 1

 2

 1


API Subgroups - Racial/Ethnic Groups

 API Base Data

 API Growth Data

 

 1999

 2000

 2001

 

From
1999
to 2000

From
2000
to 2001

From
2001
to 2002

 African-American

 African-American

 API Base Score

 

 

 

 API Growth Score

 

 

 

 Growth Target

 

 

 

 Actual Growth

 

 

 

 American Indian or Alaska Native

 American Indian or Alaska Native

 API Base Score

 

 

 

 API Growth Score

 

 

 

 Growth Target

 

 

 

 Actual Growth

 

 

 

 Asian-American

 Asian-American

 API Base Score

 488

 515

 530

 API Growth Score

 492

 519

 550

 Growth Target

 9

 9

 9

 Actual Growth

 4

 4

 20

 Filipino-American

 Filipino-American

 API Base Score

 

 

 

 API Growth Score

 

 

 

 Growth Target

 

 

 

 Actual Growth

 

 

 

 Hispanic or Latino

 Hispanic or Latino

 API Base Score

 

 

 

 API Growth Score

 

 

 

 Growth Target

 

 

 

 Actual Growth

 

 

 

 Pacific Islander

 Pacific Islander

 API Base Score

 

 

 

 API Growth Score

 

 

 

 Growth Target

 

 

 

 Actual Growth

 

 

 

 White (Not Hispanic)

 White (Not Hispanic)

 API Base Score

 607

 629

 625

 API Growth Score

 602

 625

 630

 Growth Target

 9

 9

 9

 Actual Growth

 -5

 -4

 5

API Subgroups - Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

 API Base Data

 API Growth Data

 

 1999

 2000

 2001

 

From
1999
to 2000

From
2000
to 2001

From
2001
to 2002

 API Base Score

 497

 531

 529

 API Growth Score

 523

 524

 540

 Growth Target

 9

 9

 9

 Actual Growth

 26

 -7

 11

API-Based Awards and Intervention Programs
California program data are based on API growth data from the previous academic year.
***The II/USP Program was not funded for the year 2002.

 California Programs

 Federal Programs

 

 2000

 2001

 2002

 

 2000

 2001

 2002

 Eligible for Governor's
 Performance Award

 NO

 NO

 NO

 Recognition for
 Achievement (Title 1)

 

 

 

 Eligible for II/USP

 YES

 NO

 ***

 Identified for Program
 Improvement (Title 1)

 

 

 

 Applied for II/USP $

 YES

 NO

 ***

 Exited Title 1 Program
 Improvement

 

 

 

 Received II/USP $

 YES

 NO

 ***

 

IV. School Completion (Secondary Schools)

California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE)
Beginning with the graduating class of 2004, students in California public schools will have to pass the California High School Exit Exam to receive a high school diploma. The School Accountability Report Card for that year will report the percentage of students completing grade 12 who successfully complete the California High School Exit Exam.

Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate
Data reported regarding progress over the most recent three-year period toward reducing dropout rates include: grade 9-12 enrollment, the number of dropouts, and the one-year dropout rate listed in the California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS). The formula for the one-year dropout rate is (Grades 9-12 Dropouts/Grades 9-12 Enrollment) multiplied by 100. Graduation rate data will be reported after the California State Board of Education approves a graduation rate formula.

 

 School

 District

 State

   1999  

   2000  

   2001  

   1999  

   2000  

   2001  

   1999  

   2000  

   2001  

 Enrollment (9-12)

 1031

 1099

 1112

 2749

 2874

 2881

 1659030

 1703492

 1735576

 Number of Dropouts

 31

 26

 17

 184

 164

 99

 46470

 47282

 47899

 Dropout Rate

 3.0

 2.4

 1.5

 6.7

 5.7

 3.4

 2.8

 2.8

 2.8

V. Class Size

Average Teaching Load and Teaching Load Distribution
Data reported are the average class size and the number of classrooms for each range of students, by subject area, as reported by CBEDS.

 Subject

 2000

 2001

 2002

 Avg.

 1-22

 23-32

 33+

 Avg.

 1-22

 23-32

 33+

 Avg.

 1-22

 23-32

 33+

 English

 24.12

  23

  18

  2

 24.11

  24

  19

  4

 20.87

  25

  19

  1

 Mathematics

 24.45

  18

  11

  4

 26.70

  11

  11

  8

 22.88

  20

  10

  3

 Science

 25.32

  6

  19

  0

 28.00

  5

  17

  1

 26.60

  3

  22

  0

 Social Science

 28.93

  2

  21

  7

 30.23

  1

  22

  7

 28.79

  3

  15

  10

VI. Teacher and Staff Information

Teacher Credential Information
Part-time teachers are counted as '1'. If a teacher works at two schools, he/she is only counted at one school. Data are not available for teachers with a full credential and teaching outside his/her subject area.

 

   2000  

   2001  

   2002  

 Total Number of Teachers
 

 53

 50

 48

 Full Credential
 (full credential and teaching in subject area)

 52

 48

 45

 Teaching Outside Subject Area
 (full credential but teaching outside subject area)

 

 

 

 Emergency Credential
 (includes District Internship, University Internship, Pre-Interns and Emergency Permits)

 4

 2

 2

 Teachers with Waivers
 (does not have credential and does not qualify for an Emergency Permit)

 

 1

 1

Teacher Evaluations

 TEACHER EVALUATION:

The principal and assistant principal evaluate staff each ear. The Oroville Union High School District and OSTA work cooperatively to do teacher evaluations. New teachers are evaluated at least twice a year. Tenured teachers are evaluated every other year. Sometimes it may be necessary to evaluate teachers more often.

To improve the quality of teaching, professional development is provided as well as time and funds for specialized workshops, teacher-designed learning sessions and projects. Oroville High School teachers regularly attend professional development activities.

The results of staff development activities are most often measured by student test scores, grade point averages, and drop out rates. Staff uses up-to-date teaching techniques, course and grade level standards, and efforts to improve learning and develop and use many student-centered techniques.

Substitute Teachers

Oroville Union High School District hires substitutes to a pool for all the schools in the district. Substitutes must have teaching credentials or have a Bachelor’s Degree. Those having a Bachelor’s Degree must pass the CBEST test within a calendar year.

Counselors and Other Support Staff
Data reported are in units of full-time equivalents (FTE). One FTE is defined as a staff person who is working 100% full time. Two staff persons working 50% of full time also equals one FTE.

 Title

   FTE  

 Counselor

 3

 Librarian

 1

 Psychologist

 1

Academic Counselors
Data reported are in units of full-time equivalents (FTE). One FTE is defined as a staff person who is working 100% of full time. Two staff persons working 50% of full time also equals one FTE. The ratio of pupils per academic counselor is enrollment as reported in the most recent California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS) data collection divided by the number of academic counselors.

 Number of Academic
Counselors (FTE)

 Ratio of Pupils per
Academic Counselor

 3

 342.00

VII. Curriculum and Instruction

School Instruction and Leadership

Instruction/Curriculum

The curriculum at Oroville High School has been developed through a District-wide process.  Departments review and update curriculum on a six-year cycle.  Oroville High School operates on a traditional six (6) period schedule.  Students take six courses with a common lunch period.  Oroville Union High School District wants to provide every student with the opportunity to attend college.  Oroville High School has approximately 25% of its students completing all of the UC-CSU A-G requirements.  Thirty-six percent of our students go on to attend the local community college.  Alternative scheduling (block, 0 period) is a consideration to allow a greater flexibility of options in the area of student scheduling, staff development, curriculum design, and student/teacher consultation. 

Leadership 

OHS leadership empowers the school community to share ideas, innovation, and input in the review and revision of administrative and educational policies and procedures to improve student learning and school safety. OHS's Leadership Team is the primary conduit for stakeholder-based decision making. The new Leadership Team includes the WASC focus group chairs, administration, parents, students, department chairs, and community members.  The Leadership Team will meet a minimum of once each quarter to allocate resources, and review and monitor the school-wide action plan.

Our school leadership also includes the OHS School Board, Academic Departments and Chairs, Associated Student Body, Student Senate, and the Site Council. The staff in each department meets monthly to discuss school business and academic concerns. The department chair then takes these questions, concerns, and suggestions to monthly department chair meetings with the principal. OHS's Associated Student Body and Student Senate function in advisory decision making roles. It is our belief that ASB must review and revise the student constitution as outlined in its bylaws; in addition, we believe that posting this information to the school website will allow students to receive information about important school issues.

Oroville High School’s Site Council also functions in advisory decision making roles. The OHS Site Council provides a forum for parents, students, and community members to express views and concerns regarding district and school site issues.

Parents and community are involved in various activities that contribute to student learning, school culture, and recreation.  This involvement is clearly identified in the Support for Student Personal and Academic Growth focus group's self study section in this chapter. For example, parents have been invited to participate in school committees such as WASC, II/USP, and interview committees. We have an active Parent-Teacher Association that is heavily involved in the Safe Grad Night, School Safety, and the Site Beautification Committee.

Professional Development

Every OHS staff development activity is required to support state, district, and site goals for student academic achievement and safety. Staff development is funded through individual grants and categorical grants including the II/USP and Digital High School (DHS) grant monies. Currently, tenured teachers are monitored every two years through individual performance evaluations. Non-tenured teachers are evaluated yearly. Our II/ USP plan includes a comprehensive strategy for professional development and collaborative teacher planning time to help staff integrate the state standards and ESLRs into their curriculum to improve student learning. Our Math and Language Arts teachers have attended numerous meetings with Butte County Office of Education to align their curriculum to the state content standards and create quarterly standards aligned assessments. Similar professional development workshops are planned for teachers in all subject areas through the 2003-2004 school year. Our Digital High School Grant is providing opportunities to meet objectives and to train teachers in technology applications for integration into the curriculum.  

Aside from our current II/ USP and DHS professional development objectives and assessment plans, experienced teachers choose their own individual staff development activities. For example, we recommend utilization of II/USP monies to implement a school visitation program that will allow OHS teachers to learn additional best practices and strategies.

Historically, teachers have been involved in discipline-specific conferences, seminars, and workshops funded by SB1882. We have a Beginning Teachers’ Support and Assessment plan that is funded through our general fund BTSA monitors and supports beginning teachers, offering a peer support, analysis of classroom practices, and California Standards for the Teaching profession.  Beginning teachers are well supported through BTSA or University Internship Programs.

Quality and Currency of Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials

Textbooks are adopted by the district from a list determined by the State Department of Education on a seven year cycle. Teachers, administrators, and district personnel choose textbooks from the list approved by the State Board. Textbook adoptions were made this year in biology, and Earth Science. The average textbook ranges in price from $50 to $70.

Instructional Minutes
The California Education Code establishes the required number of instructional minutes per year for each grade. Data reported compares the number of instructional minutes offered at the school level to the state requirement for each grade.

 Grade
Level

 Instructional Minutes

 Offered

 State Requirement

 9

65,092

 64,800

 10

 65,092

 64,800

 11

 65,092

 64,800

 12

 65,092

 64,800


Total Number of Minimum Days 8


VIII. Postsecondary Preparation (Secondary Schools)

Advanced Placement/International Baccalaureate Courses Offered
The Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) programs give students an opportunity to take college-level courses and exams while still in high school. The table below shows the number of classes offered and the enrollment in various AP and IB classes. The data for Fine and Performing Arts includes AP Art and AP Music, and the data for Social Science include IB Humanities.

 Subject

 Number of Courses

 Number of Classes

 Enrollment

 Fine and Performing Arts

 1

 4

 5

 Computer Science

 

 

 

 English

 1

 2

 38

 Foreign Language

 1

 1

 2

 Mathematics

 1

 1

 9

 Science

 2

 2

 47

 Social Science

 

 3

 39

Pupils Enrolled in Courses Required for University of California (UC) and California State University (CSU) Admission (Grades 9-12)
The percentage of pupils enrolled in courses required for UC and/or CSU admission is calculated by dividing the total number of pupils in courses required for UC and/or UC admission (duplicated count) by the total number of pupils in all courses (also a duplicated count) for the most recent year.

 Number of Pupils
Enrolled in all Courses

 Number of Pupils Enrolled
In Courses Required
For UC and/or CSU Admission

 Percentage of Pupils Enrolled
In Courses Required
For UC and/or CSU Admission

 4411

 2517

 57.1


Graduates Who Have Passed Courses Required for University of California (UC) and California State University (CSU) Admission
The percentage of graduates is the number of graduates who have passed course requirements for UC and/or CSU admission divided by the school's California Basic Educational Data System (CBEDS) total graduates for the most recent year.

 Number of Graduates

 Number of Graduates
Who Have Passed Course Requirements
For UC and/or CSU Admission

 Percentage of Graduates
Who Have Passed Course Requirements
For UC and/or CSU Admission

 161

 57

 35.4

SAT I Reasoning Test
Students may voluntarily take the SAT test for college entrance. The test may or may not be available to students at a given school. Students may take the test more than once, but only the highest score is reported at the year of graduation.

 

 School

 District

 State

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 2000

 2001

 2002

 Grade 12 Enrollment

 221

 213

 205

 619

 614

 614

 347813

 357789

 365907

 Percentage of Grade 12
 Enrollment Taking Test

 27

 30

 24

 21

 21

 22

 36

 37

 37

 Average Verbal Score

 442

 461

 450

 454

 469

 471

 492

 492

 490

 Average Math Score

 459

 479

 474

 468

 485

 484

 517

 516

 516

Degree to Which Students are Prepared to Enter Workforce

The Vocational Education Departments have aligned their standards and benchmarks with the state frameworks that have been developed and adopted by the District.  Career pathways include Food Service and Hospitality, Fashion Design and Merchandising, Childhood Development and Education, Construction Technology, Drafting Technology, Computer Science & Information Systems, and Accounting & Finance. Career opportunities are extended through the Le Tigre Café and the Lil’ Tigger Pre School and several ROP courses. Computers for the 21st Century gives students an opportunity to learn advanced computer programs such as PowerPoint.  Students experience real-world application of learning through CAD Drafting.  CAD students may also work with journalism students to produce an on-line newspaper and do web design.  Fashion Design and Merchandising students use local retail stores as community classrooms for such units as visual merchandising, buying, and sales.

Enrollment and Program Completion in Career/Technical Education Programs
Data are available from the Report of Career-Technical Education Enrollment and Program Completion for School Year 2001-2002 (CDE 101 E-1). Data have been aggregated to the district level.

 CTE Participants 

 Secondary CTE Students

 Grade 12 CTE Students

 Total
Course
Enrollment

 Number
of
Concentrators

 Number
of
Completers

 Completion
Rate

 Number
of
Completers

 Number
Earning
Diploma

 Graduation
Rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IX. Fiscal and Expenditure Data

Average Salaries (Fiscal Year 2000-2001)
Statewide data categories used for comparison are determined by type (Elementary, High, and Unified) and enrollment, as defined in Management Bulletin 02-04. The statewide average for principals is aggregated by district. There is no statewide average calculated for Common Administration Districts.

 Category

 District Amount

 State Average
For Districts
In Same Category

 Beginning Teacher Salary

 34000

 33859

 Mid-Range Teacher Salary

 46764

 53134

 Highest Teacher Salary

 63804

 67718

 Average Principal Salary (Elementary)

 

 88469

 Average Principal Salary (Middle)

 

 Average Principal Salary (High)

 83677

 Superintendent Salary

 94622

 110625

 Percentage of Budget for Teacher Salaries

 34.58

 38.56

 Percentage of Budget for Administrative Salaries

 4.66

 5.66

Additional Compensation for Administrators N/A

Expenditures (Fiscal Year 2000-2001)

 District

 District

 State Average
For Districts
In Same Category

 State Average
All Districts

 Total Dollars

 Dollars per Student
(ADA)

 Dollars per Student
(ADA)

 Dollars per Student
(ADA)

 $16,142,946

 $6,350

 $6,534

 $6,360